Two men share securities regulation news

Breaking news and expert analysis on legal and compliance issues

[Back To Home][Back To Archives]

From Securities Regulation Daily, November 11, 2013

Bear Stearns liquidators sue S&P, Moody’s, and Fitch

By Anne Sherry, J.D.

The liquidators of two Bear Stearns Funds (Funds) that invested in structured finance securities filed a fraud complaint against S&P, Moody’s, and Fitch. The complaint, which fills nearly 150 pages, tells the story of a “house of cards” built by the credit rating agencies, the collapse of which resulted in the Funds’ losing more than $1 billion. The suit is the latest in a wave of litigation against credit rating agencies by financial institutions, shareholders, and state governments (Varga v. McGraw Hill Financial, Inc., November 11, 2013).

Funds’ losses. The Bear Stearns Funds were structured to invest at least 90 percent of their portfolios in high-grade securities — those rated AAA, AA, or AA or equivalent. The complaint alleges that the credit rating agencies fraudulently upheld AAA or AA ratings on structured finance products despite turmoil in the housing market; as a result of the high ratings, the Funds maintained their investment in those products. The Funds suffered more than $1 billion in losses when the market collapsed. “Put simply, the Rating Agencies engaged in a massive fraud upon the market, and specifically upon the Funds,” the complaint alleged.

Alleged fraud. The complaint’s single count is for common law fraud on the basis that the rating agencies knowingly made false and misleading representations and omissions on which the Funds reasonably relied, to their detriment. According to the plaintiffs, market participants necessarily relied on the ratings and on the rating agencies’ representations because the underlying loan-level information was opaque; often, issuers provided confidential information only to the rating agencies and did not disseminate this information to the public at all.

The complaint asserts that the rating agencies represented that their ratings were the independent, objective results of high-quality credit analyses. In reality, the defendants allegedly relaxed their rating standards to protect their position in the market and to appease the issuers of the securities, which paid them for the ratings. The rating agencies allegedly delayed development and implementation of new ratings models and surveillance to avoid ratings downgrades, the complaint continues. In particular, they disregarded information regarding the deterioration of the housing market and corresponding deterioration of the mortgages underlying the structured finance products they rated, the plaintiffs allege.

The case is No. 652410/2013.

Attorneys: James C. McCarroll (Reed Smith LLP) for Geoffrey Varga.

Companies: McGraw Hill Financial, Inc.; Standard & Poor’s Financial Services LLC; Moody’s Corp.; Fitch Group Inc.

MainStory: TopStory CreditRatingAgencies FraudManipulation NewYorkNews

Securities Regulation Daily

Introducing Wolters Kluwer Securities Regulation Daily — a daily reporting service created by attorneys, for attorneys — providing same-day coverage of breaking news, court decisions, legislation, and regulatory activity.

A complete daily report of the news that affects your world

  • View full summaries of federal and state court decisions.
  • Access full text of legislative and regulatory developments.
  • Customize your daily email by topic and/or jurisdiction.
  • Search archives for stories of interest.

Not just news — the right news

  • Get expert analysis written by subject matter specialists—created by attorneys for attorneys.
  • Track law firms and organizations in the headlines with our new “Who’s in the News” feature.
  • Promote your firm with our new reprint policy.

24/7 access for a 24/7 world

  • Forward information with special copyright permissions, encouraging collaboration between counsel and colleagues.
  • Save time with mobile apps for your BlackBerry, iPhone, iPad, Android, or Kindle.
  • Access all links from any mobile device without being prompted for user name and password.