Man unsure of the safety of his medicine

Breaking news and expert analysis on legal and compliance issues

[Back To Home][Back To Archives]

From Products Liability Law Daily, March 18, 2016

Texas jury awards nearly $500 million to five Pinnacle hip implant patients

By John W. Scanlan, J.D.

Five hip implant patients who needed revision surgery to replace their implants were awarded $360 million in punitive damages and about $140 million in personal injury damages against DePuy Orthopaedics, the manufacturer of the Pinnacle implant, and Johnson & Johnson, DePuy’s parent company (In re: DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. Pinnacle Implant Products Liability Litigation, March 17, 2016, Kinkeade, E.).

Each of the five patients underwent a hip arthroplasty procedure in which a Pinnacle MoM Device was implanted. This “metal on metal” device is a Class III medical device manufactured by DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. After their surgeries, each of the patients reported pain and difficulty with their implants and subsequently underwent revision surgery to replace the implants with a “ceramic on polyethylene” implant. The patients filed separate suits against DePuy as well as Johnson & Johnson, DePuy’s parent company, bringing claims for negligence, design defect, manufacturing defect, failure to warn, breach of express and implied warranties, and fraud. Two of the patients also alleged tortious interference with the doctor/patient relationship, asserting that the defendants knowingly engaged their physician as an expert witness in the litigation. The patients asserted that the metal on metal Pinnacle implants generate unusually high amounts of metal wear debris and ions that spread throughout surrounding bone and tissue, causing various conditions including metallosis, tissue death, bone loss, and high failure rates, along with unsafe cobalt and chromium levels.

Jury findings/charges. The jury found for all five patients on their strict liability claims for design defect and marketing defect against DePuy. It also found that Johnson & Johnson had participated in the implant’s design and was engaged in the business of selling it, but determined that it knew of the defect at the time it supplied the implant with respect to only one of the five patients. The jury found Johnson & Johnson negligently undertook its duty to provide services to DePuy that proximately caused the injuries to all five. In addition, the jury concluded that Johnson & Johnson knowingly gave substantial assistance to DePuy’s tortious conduct with respect to all five patients.

However, the jury did not find that DePuy had engaged in commercial bribery of the physician who had served as the orthopedic surgeon for two of the patients by hiring him as an expert witness in the litigation.

Personal injury damages. For their personal injury damages, one patient was awarded nearly $50 million, with about $2.5 million to his wife; close to $16 million to a second, with around $750,000 to his wife; $15 million to a third, along with $1.2 million to his wife; and about $30 million each to two other patients.

Exemplary damages. Concluding that exemplary damages were warranted against both companies for their fraud and gross negligence respecting each of the five patients, the jury awarded $120 million against DePuy and $240 million against Johnson & Johnson.

The case is No. 3:11-MD-2244-K (Aoki 3:13-cv-1071Christopher 3:14-cv-1994Greer 3:12-cv-1672Klusmann 3:11-cv-2800Peterson 3:11-cv-1941).

Attorneys: Stephen E. Harrison, II (Harrison Davis Steakley Morrison, PC) for Robert Peterson. Jessica D. Miller (Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP) and Michael V. Powell (Locke Lord LLP) for Johnson & Johnson Services Inc., DePuy Orthopaedics Inc., DePuy Products Inc., DePuy Synthes Inc. and Johnson & Johnson.

Companies: Johnson & Johnson Services Inc.; DePuy Orthopaedics Inc.; DePuy Products Inc.; DePuy Synthes Inc.; Johnson & Johnson

MainStory: TopStory JuryVerdictsNewsStory DesignManufacturingNews WarningsNews SCLIssuesNews DamagesNews MedicalDevicesNews TexasNews

Back to Top

Products Liability Law Daily

Introducing Wolters Kluwer Products Liability Law Daily — a daily reporting service created by attorneys, for attorneys — providing same-day coverage of breaking news, court decisions, legislation, and regulatory activity.

A complete daily report of the news that affects your world

  • View full summaries of federal and state court decisions.
  • Access full text of legislative and regulatory developments.
  • Customize your daily email by topic and/or jurisdiction.
  • Search archives for stories of interest.

Not just news — the right news

  • Get expert analysis written by subject matter specialists—created by attorneys for attorneys.
  • Track law firms and organizations in the headlines with our new “Who’s in the News” feature.
  • Promote your firm with our new reprint policy.

24/7 access for a 24/7 world

  • Forward information with special copyright permissions, encouraging collaboration between counsel and colleagues.
  • Save time with mobile apps for your BlackBerry, iPhone, iPad, Android, or Kindle.
  • Access all links from any mobile device without being prompted for user name and password.