Man unsure of the safety of his medicine

Breaking news and expert analysis on legal and compliance issues

[Back To Home][Back To Archives]

From Products Liability Law Daily, March 29, 2019

J&J not liable in talc-related mass tort suit

By Georgia D. Koutouzos, J.D.

Mesothelioma victim wasn’t exposed to asbestos in baby powder, the jury unanimously found.

A New Jersey state-court jury exonerated personal care product giant Johnson & Johnson of liability related to a man who had developed malignant mesothelioma due to his decades-long exposure to asbestos-containing products, including talc-based baby powder. In a unanimous verdict favoring the company, the jury concluded that the ailing man failed to prove by a preponderance of the evidence that he had been exposed to asbestos from J&J’s baby powder (Rimondi v. Johnson & Johnson Consumer Inc., March 27, 2019, Judge, J.).

A man who had been diagnosed with malignant mesothelioma in 2016 as the alleged result of his exposure to asbestos from products containing that substance over a 50-year period filed suit in New Jersey state court the following year against dozens of manufacturers, including Johnson & Johnson and its personal care division, Johnson & Johnson Consumer Inc. (J&J), as well as other, so-called "talc defendants," i.e., companies that manufactured and sold cosmetic talc-containing products contaminated with asbestos.

Among the ten causes of action asserted in his complaint were claims for negligence, negligence per se, breach of warranty, strict liability—manufacturing and design defect, fraudulent misrepresentation, and loss of consortium. Demanding a jury trial, the ailing man sought compensatory damages, punitive damages, and costs.

With respect to the negligence and products liability claims, the plaintiff alleged that J&J and others mined, milled, processed, imported, converted, compounded, designed, manufactured, marketed, supplied, distributed, sold and/or otherwise placed in the stream of commerce asbestos-containing cosmetic and/or personal hygiene products to which he had been exposed.

In addition, J&J participated in a conspiracy with one or more co-conspirator defendants, he maintained, asserting that the companies had a duty to produce, market, and sell products that were not unreasonably dangerous or defective when used as intended or in a reasonably foreseeable manner. The defendants also had a duty to warn consumers of the known hazards and defects in the products, and should have known, that the use of their products would release asbestos, thereby creating a dangerous and unreasonable risk of injury to users and others coming into contact with that hazardous substance.

The case went to trial, after which the jury returned a unanimous verdict concluding that the man did not prove by a preponderance of the evidence that he had been exposed to asbestos from J&J’s baby powder. The "no" answer to that first question on the verdict sheet obviated the need for the jury to respond to any of the remaining questions related to manufacturing defect, design defect, and failure to warn, or to award any damages to the plaintiff and his spouse.

The case is No. MID L-002912-17.

Attorneys: Monica Cooper (The Lanier Law Firm PLLC) for Ricardo Rimondi. Allison Brown (Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP) for Johnson & Johnson Consumer Inc.

Companies: Johnson & Johnson Consumer Inc.

MainStory: TopStory JuryVerdictsNewsStory DesignManufacturingNews WarningsNews HouseholdProductsNews AsbestosNews NewJerseyNews

Back to Top

Products Liability Law Daily

Introducing Wolters Kluwer Products Liability Law Daily — a daily reporting service created by attorneys, for attorneys — providing same-day coverage of breaking news, court decisions, legislation, and regulatory activity.


A complete daily report of the news that affects your world

  • View full summaries of federal and state court decisions.
  • Access full text of legislative and regulatory developments.
  • Customize your daily email by topic and/or jurisdiction.
  • Search archives for stories of interest.

Not just news — the right news

  • Get expert analysis written by subject matter specialists—created by attorneys for attorneys.
  • Track law firms and organizations in the headlines with our new “Who’s in the News” feature.
  • Promote your firm with our new reprint policy.

24/7 access for a 24/7 world

  • Forward information with special copyright permissions, encouraging collaboration between counsel and colleagues.
  • Save time with mobile apps for your BlackBerry, iPhone, iPad, Android, or Kindle.
  • Access all links from any mobile device without being prompted for user name and password.