Doctor concerned with health care law

Breaking news and expert analysis on legal and compliance issues

[Back To Home][Back To Archives]

From Health Law Daily,November 26, 2013

Supreme Court to hear controversial contraception cases

By Patricia K. Ruiz, JD

The Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS) announced today that it will hear two major cases involving dispute over insurance coverage for contraceptives mandated by the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (PPACA) (P.L. 111-148). The two cases, Sebelius v Hobby Lobby Stores, Inc. and Conestoga Wood Specialties v Sebelius are both suits requesting an exemption from the PPACA mandate to provide contraceptive coverage to its employees on the basis of religious objection by the owners.

Sebelius v Hobby Lobby. The owners of Hobby Lobby, a chain of arts-and-crafts stores, believe that human life begins at conception and decided to exclude from its group health insurance coverage for contraceptives that prevent fertilized eggs from implanting in the uterus, namely intrauterine devices (IUDs), Plan B® (the morning after pill), and Ella® (the week after pill), we reported previously. They brought suit against the government alleging that the contraceptive mandate violates the Free Exercise Clause of the First Amendment, as well as the Religious Freedom Restoration Act (RFRA) (P.L. 103-141), which states that the government “shall not substantially burden a person’s exercise of religion” unless it is the least restrictive means to further a compelling government interest.

As we reported previously, the Tenth Circuit ruled that for-profit corporations could deny contraceptive coverage to employees, even if otherwise entitled by federal law, on the basis of religious objections by the individuals controlling corporation. The government requested review by SCOTUS, arguing that the decision by the Tenth Circuit conflicts with recent decisions of other appeals courts and that religious exemptions are not available to for-profit corporations.

Conestoga Wood Specialties v Sebelius. Conestoga Wood Specialties (Conestoga), a secular, for-profit corporation, was previously denied an injunction preventing enforcement of the contraceptive mandate. The company, owned by a Mennonite family, objected to Plan B and Ella. In its decision the Third Circuit stated that the Free Exercise Clause protects religious freedom of individuals from government interference. However, secular corporations, which do not pray, worship, observe sacraments, or engage in other religious activity, are not entitled to Free Exercise Clause protection, and the rights of the owners do not pass through to the corporation. Conestoga petitioned for certiorari.

Following the announcement from SCOTUS, the White House released a statement, which said, “We believe this requirement is lawful and essential to women’s health and are confident the Supreme Court will agree.” The statement referenced the exceptions and accommodations offered under the contraceptive mandate and concluded, “These steps protect both women’s health and religious beliefs, and seek to ensure that women and families—not their bosses or corporate CEOs—can make personal health decisions based on their needs and their budgets.”

MainStory: TopStory SupremeCourtNews WhiteHouseNews HealthCareReformNews HealthReformNews

Health Law Daily

Introducing Wolters Kluwer Health Law Daily — a daily reporting service created by attorneys, for attorneys — providing same-day coverage of breaking news, court decisions, legislation, and regulatory activity.

A complete daily report of the news that affects your world

  • View full summaries of federal and state court decisions.
  • Access full text of legislative and regulatory developments.
  • Customize your daily email by topic and/or jurisdiction.
  • Search archives for stories of interest.

Not just news — the right news

  • Get expert analysis written by subject matter specialists—created by attorneys for attorneys.
  • Track law firms and organizations in the headlines with our new “Who’s in the News” feature.
  • Promote your firm with our new reprint policy.

24/7 access for a 24/7 world

  • Forward information with special copyright permissions, encouraging collaboration between counsel and colleagues.
  • Save time with mobile apps for your BlackBerry, iPhone, iPad, Android, or Kindle.
  • Access all links from any mobile device without being prompted for user name and password.