Doctor concerned with health care law

Breaking news and expert analysis on legal and compliance issues

[Back To Home][Back To Archives]

From Health Law Daily, February 1, 2018

FQHC not entitled to full reimbursement from MCO

By Lindsey Firnbach, J.D.

A decision that the Texas Health and Human Services Commission (Commission) violated the Medicaid Act was reversed and remanded by the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals because the Act does not require that the Commission demand reimbursement from managed care organizations (MCOs) to federally qualified health centers (FQHCs). Additionally, the Medicaid Act does not require that FQHCs be reimbursed for non-emergency out-of network services (Legacy Community Health Services, Inc. v. Smith, January 31, 2018, Smith, J.).

Background. Legacy Community Health Services (Legacy), an FQHC, sued the Commission after it was denied reimbursement for claims it presented to the Texas Children’s Health Plan (TCHP), an MCO with which it had previously been in contract. States can contract with MCOs, which serve as the middleman between the state and FQHCs; the state provides funding to MCOs and in turn, MCOs distribute reimbursement to FQHCs. If a contract does not exist between the MCO and the FQHC, the MCO is only required to provide reimbursement for emergency treatments. The state can provide FQHCs with a "wraparound" payment in the amount of the difference between the PPS amount and what the MCO pays. After Texas removed its wraparound policy, Legacy incurred increased costs and the contract between Legacy and the TCHP was cancelled. Thereafter, TCHP refused many claims on the grounds they were either unauthorized or nonemergency. Legacy sued, arguing that the policies of the Commission were a violation of the Medicaid Act.

The district court granted summary judgment in favor of Legacy, finding that the Commission violated the Medicaid Act when it made MCOs responsible for FQHC reimbursement (see Health centers must be reimbursed, even for out-of-network services, September 6, 2016). It reasoned that the Commission erred by not having a policy that requires the state to reimburse in the absence of full reimbursement by the MCO, and the lapse of a requirement for the reimbursement for nonemergency, out-of-network services.

The claims. The appeals court ruled that the language of the Medicaid Act did not prevent the Commission from requiring MCOs to fully reimburse FQHCs, nor did it require that Legacy be reimbursed for all services. The language of the statute only required that payments be made for any shortfall, but not that states could not require MCOs to pay the full rate. Additionally, the language indicated that only emergency services are required to be reimbursed by MCOs; if the statute required states to reimburse all out-of-network services, there would be little incentive for MCOs to contract with FQHCs.

Dissent. The dissent agreed with the outcome of the decision, but argued that instead of ruling that Legacy could not demonstrate on the merits that the Medicaid Act did not allow the Commission to make MCOs reimburse the FQHCs, summary judgment was not proper because Legacy could not prove standing. To the dissent, Legacy failed to present an injury, and merely stating that there is an injury based on the breach of contract was not sufficient.

The case is No. 16-20691.

Attorneys: Edward Todd Waters (Feldesman Tucker Leifer Fidell LLP) for Legacy Community Health Services, Inc. Lisa Bennett, Office of the Attorney General, for Charles Smith, Executive Commissioner, Texas Health and Human Services Commission.

Companies: Legacy Community Health Services, Inc.; Texas Health and Human Services Commission

MainStory: TopStory CaseDecisions CMSNews ManagedCareNews MedicaidPaymentNews ProviderNews LouisianaNews MississippiNews TexasNews

Back to Top

Health Law Daily

Introducing Wolters Kluwer Health Law Daily — a daily reporting service created by attorneys, for attorneys — providing same-day coverage of breaking news, court decisions, legislation, and regulatory activity.

A complete daily report of the news that affects your world

  • View full summaries of federal and state court decisions.
  • Access full text of legislative and regulatory developments.
  • Customize your daily email by topic and/or jurisdiction.
  • Search archives for stories of interest.

Not just news — the right news

  • Get expert analysis written by subject matter specialists—created by attorneys for attorneys.
  • Track law firms and organizations in the headlines with our new “Who’s in the News” feature.
  • Promote your firm with our new reprint policy.

24/7 access for a 24/7 world

  • Forward information with special copyright permissions, encouraging collaboration between counsel and colleagues.
  • Save time with mobile apps for your BlackBerry, iPhone, iPad, Android, or Kindle.
  • Access all links from any mobile device without being prompted for user name and password.