Doctor concerned with health care law

Breaking news and expert analysis on legal and compliance issues

[Back To Home][Back To Archives]

From Health Law Daily, September 23, 2014

Congressman’s letter challenges CMS authority to settle administrative backlog

By Bryant Storm, JD

A letter challenging the authority of CMS to continue with its Medicare appeals settlements was sent from Chairman of the Ways and Means Committee and U.S. Representative Kevin Brady (R-TX) to HSS Secretary Sylvia Burwell. The letter criticizes HHS for its quiet handling of the manner and urges HHS to provide an explanation for its authority to engage in an “all or nothing” settlement process to wipe out some of the agency’s backlog of administrative appeals at a set 68 percent reimbursement rate.

Settlement. Following concerns about a growing backlog of cases awaiting administrative hearings before an Administrative Law Judge (ALJ), CMS announced its intention to offer to pay hospital’s 68 percent of the amount of the claims they have pending in the appeal process (see, Consumer class action challenges “broken” Medicare appeals system, August 27, 2014). CMS indicated that the settlement process would relieve some of the backlog of appeals, many of which related to recovery audit contractor (RAC) decisions that inpatient claims were not reasonable or necessary (see, CMS offers partial payments for certain Part A hospital claims under appeal, September 3, 2014).

Rollout. Referring to the HHS announcement of the settlement process as an “audacious rollout,” the letter criticizes the manner in which HHS reached its decision. Expressing concern that the decision was not well thought out, the letter indicates disappointment that HHS did not consult more information or the Ways and Means committee when reaching its decisions.

Authority. Brady’s critique rests heavily on a concern regarding the authority of HHS to engage in the settlements at all. Although the letter recognizes that HHS states the Federal Claims Collection Act (31 U.S.C. sec. 3711) authorizes the settlements, the letter expresses doubt that either federal statute or federal regulation, under 42 C.F.R. sec. 405.376, provide authority for HHS to settle claims for overpayments that arise from a determination that the services were not covered due to a lack of medical necessity.

Process. The letter also criticizes the settlement process chosen by CMS. Specifically, Brady questions the “all or nothing” approach because, the letter contends, each appeal is unique and the “circumstances that apply pertaining to medical necessity do not necessarily transfer to all cases.” Additionally, Brady questions how CMS arrived at the 68 percent figure because CMS has not provided the empirical analysis that led to that percentage. Pointing to a Medicare Payment Advisory Commission (MedPac) Report, Brady indicates that Medicare data suggests the settlement figure could reasonably have been closer to 36 percent than to 68 percent.In light of the lack of information, the letter urges CMS to reveal the data analysis used to reach the 68 percent settlement figure.

The letter closes by urging HHS to retract the proposed settlement process.In place of the settlement process, Brady asked HHS to work with him to reach a “transparent and conclusive” alternative.

MainStory: TopStory HouseNews CMSNews ClaimsAppealsNews PaymentNews PartANews IPPSNews RACNews

Health Law Daily

Introducing Wolters Kluwer Health Law Daily — a daily reporting service created by attorneys, for attorneys — providing same-day coverage of breaking news, court decisions, legislation, and regulatory activity.

A complete daily report of the news that affects your world

  • View full summaries of federal and state court decisions.
  • Access full text of legislative and regulatory developments.
  • Customize your daily email by topic and/or jurisdiction.
  • Search archives for stories of interest.

Not just news — the right news

  • Get expert analysis written by subject matter specialists—created by attorneys for attorneys.
  • Track law firms and organizations in the headlines with our new “Who’s in the News” feature.
  • Promote your firm with our new reprint policy.

24/7 access for a 24/7 world

  • Forward information with special copyright permissions, encouraging collaboration between counsel and colleagues.
  • Save time with mobile apps for your BlackBerry, iPhone, iPad, Android, or Kindle.
  • Access all links from any mobile device without being prompted for user name and password.