Doctor concerned with health care law

Breaking news and expert analysis on legal and compliance issues

[Back To Home][Back To Archives]

From Health Law Daily, August 25, 2014

AHA seeks metamorphosis of OIG’s ‘Kafkaesque’ overpayment burden

By Sarah E. Baumann, JD

On August 21, 2014, the American Hospital Association (AHA) sent a second strongly worded letter to the HHS Secretary complaining of the HHS Office of Inspector General’s practice of improperly using extrapolation to determine a hospital system’s estimated Medicare overpayment, as well as its misconstruction and misapplication of a number of other Medicare regulations and policies. Rick Pollack, Executive Vice President of the AHA, told Secretary Burwell that he had hoped the OIG’s extrapolation approach, which “grossly exaggerates” overpayments and “leads to excessive recoveries” had been halted after the AHA submitted a June 2, 2014 letter to former Secretary Sebelius. In the earlier letter, Pollack complained, “The Kafkaesque burden of imposing duplicative audits on hospitals and recouping payments from them without correcting the OIG’s manifold and glaring errors is abusive and unfair to hospitals and a waste of government resources.” (SeeHospitals claim OIG compliance audits are redundant and not following the law, June 5, 2014.)

Recent audit. The August letter states that the recent audit report calculated overpayments due for erroneously paid inpatient claims because patients’ medical records did not include admission orders signed by physicians. However, the letter argues that the claims were made prior to 2013 and that regulations did not require such an order until October 1, 2013. In Pollack’s prior words, “The OIG invented a physician order requirement that . . . did not exist.” Furthermore, the OIG failed to offset the hospital system’s alleged Medicare overpayments due for inpatient claims that should have been billed as outpatient claims by the amount of Part B payments that the hospital would be entitled to receive.

Other complaints. In addition to the issues discussed above, the AHA’s earlier letter accused the OIG of misinterpreting section 1870 of the Social Security Act (the Act), which presumes that hospitals are “without fault,” absent contrary evidence, when overpayment determinations are made after the third year following the year in which the Part A payment was originally made. The AHA stated that hospitals could not be at fault after 2012 for payments made in 2009, but the OIG interpretation deemed hospitals to be at fault for any incorrect application of Medicare manual provisions. The AHA also accused the OIG of basing audits on claims made more than four years ago, which could not be reopened, and conducting audits redundant to recovery audit contractor (RAC) audits.

MainStory: TopStory NewsStory ComplianceNews IPPSNews AuditNews PaymentNews PartANews PartBNews ProgramIntegrityNews RACNews

Health Law Daily

Introducing Wolters Kluwer Health Law Daily — a daily reporting service created by attorneys, for attorneys — providing same-day coverage of breaking news, court decisions, legislation, and regulatory activity.

A complete daily report of the news that affects your world

  • View full summaries of federal and state court decisions.
  • Access full text of legislative and regulatory developments.
  • Customize your daily email by topic and/or jurisdiction.
  • Search archives for stories of interest.

Not just news — the right news

  • Get expert analysis written by subject matter specialists—created by attorneys for attorneys.
  • Track law firms and organizations in the headlines with our new “Who’s in the News” feature.
  • Promote your firm with our new reprint policy.

24/7 access for a 24/7 world

  • Forward information with special copyright permissions, encouraging collaboration between counsel and colleagues.
  • Save time with mobile apps for your BlackBerry, iPhone, iPad, Android, or Kindle.
  • Access all links from any mobile device without being prompted for user name and password.