Man looking concerned

Breaking news and expert analysis on legal and compliance issues

[Back To Home][Back To Archives]

From Health Reform WK-EDGE, February 6, 2019

Excepted benefit HRAs will offer employers limited relief, says HUB International

By Lauren Bikoff, MLS

New HHS proposal allowing integration of health reimbursement arrangements with individual health insurance coverage may lack practicality.

In October 2018, the Departments of Treasury, Health and Human Services, and Labor released proposed rules that would allow employers to integrate health reimbursement arrangements (HRAs) with individual health insurance coverage when certain conditions are met. The proposed rules also set forth conditions under which certain HRAs would be recognized as limited excepted benefits. However, most employers are likely to find excepted benefit HRAs to lack practical uses, according to recent comments from the HUB International employee benefits compliance team.

Background. Excepted benefit HRAs would cover limited excepted benefits, which are generally not subject to Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (ACA) requirements, such as vision, dental, and long-term care benefits, among others. Under the proposed rules, employers must offer "regular" coverage to employees in order to also offer an excepted benefit HRA. In addition, the amount of reimbursement is limited to $1,800 per year, cannot reimburse individuals for group health plan premiums or Medicare parts B or D, and must be available on the "same terms" to similarly situated employees.

Limited relief. HUB noted that while this proposed excepted benefit HRA is a potential additional benefit option, "it overlaps significantly with existing excepted benefits." Currently, an employer may offer an HRA that covers dental, vision, and long-term care without the $1,800 cap, without the requirement to offer a separate health plan, and without the "same terms" requirement. "Therefore, for those types of coverage, this excepted benefit HRA is actually more restrictive."

Using the excepted benefit HRA to reimburse COBRA premiums "does not offer plan sponsors meaningful utility," according to HUB. "There are numerous (and significant) perils to subsidizing COBRA. Plus, the combination of the ‘same-terms’ requirement and the existing tax code nondiscrimination rules might require the excepted benefit HRA to be offered more broadly than the employer would like. Finally, $1,800 isn’t much of a subsidy for COBRA premiums."

HUB cautions employers not to rush to set these types of accounts up, especially since the final regulations may specify much different requirements. "Employers who might be interested in establishing an excepted benefit HRA should wait until additional clarifications are provided," HUB concluded.

IndustryNews: NewsStory AccessNews AgencyNews EssentialBenefitNews InsurerNews LargeEmployerNews NewsFeed

Back to Top

Health Reform / WK-EDGE

Introducing Wolters Kluwer WK-EDGE — created by attorneys, for attorneys — providing timely coverage of breaking news, court decisions, legislation, and regulatory activity.


A complete weekly report of the news that affects your world

  • View full summaries of federal and state court decisions.
  • Access full text of legislative and regulatory developments.
  • Customize your weekly email by topic and/or jurisdiction.
  • Search archives for stories of interest.

Not just news — the right news

  • Get expert analysis written by subject matter specialists—created by attorneys for attorneys.
  • Track law firms and organizations in the headlines with our new “Who’s in the News” feature.
  • Promote your firm with our new reprint policy.

24/7 access for a 24/7 world

  • Forward information with special copyright permissions, encouraging collaboration between counsel and colleagues.
  • Save time with mobile apps for your BlackBerry, iPhone, iPad, Android, or Kindle.
  • Access all links from any mobile device without being prompted for user name and password.