Man in violation of privacy law

Breaking news and expert analysis on legal and compliance issues

[Back To Home][Back To Archives]

From Antitrust Law Daily, October 11, 2017

Qualcomm fined by Taiwan FTC for competition law violations, pledges appeal

By Jeffrey May, J.D.

The Taiwan Fair Trade Commission (TFTC) has fined Qualcomm Inc. approximately $23.4 billion Taiwan dollars (about U.S. $773 million) for violating the country’s competition laws in its licensing of patents essential to mobile communications standards. In a statement today, the chip supplier said it disagreed with the TFTC’s decision and that it would seek to stay any required behavioral measures and appeal the decision to the Taiwanese courts. Qualcomm questioned the fine, saying that the fine bore no rational relationship to the amount of Qualcomm’s revenues or activities in Taiwan. The TFTC has not yet released an English-language version of its summary of the decision.

Taiwan is not alone in challenging Qualcomm’s licensing practices on competition grounds. In the United States, during the final days of the Obama Administration, the FTC filed a complaint, alleging that the company monopolized the modem chip market by, among other things, consistently refusing to license standard-essential patents on fair, reasonable, and non-discriminatory or FRAND terms to competitors. The agency said in a statement at that time that the company’s sales and licensing practices hampered Qualcomm’s competitors and threaten innovation in mobile communications. The agency is seeking an injunction against Qualcomm "to undo and prevent its unfair methods of competition in or affecting commerce." The complaint was filed over the objection of the current acting chairman of the agency.

Apple Inc. also filed a complaint against Qualcomm, contending that the company violated federal antitrust and patent law by breaching its commitment to license certain patents that were essential to the latest cellular standards on FRAND terms. That suit seeks $1 billion in damages from rebate payments Qualcomm allegedly withheld, as well as injunctive and declaratory relief ranging from findings of Apple’s non-infringement of numerous patents to setting FRAND royalties for any patents-in-suit determined to be essential and infringed by Apple. The suit also seeks redress for Qualcomm’s abuse of its monopoly power in the technologies used to connect to cellular networks.

Outside the United States, Korea’s FTC has fined Qualcomm for antitrust violations as well. In December 2016, the KFTC announced that it had fined Qualcomm millions for allegedly coercing the execution and performance of unfair license agreements by using its chipset supply as leverage and circumventing FRAND commitments. In response, Qualcomm saidthat it would file an appeal in that matter when the order became final.

Companies: Qualcomm Inc.

MainStory: TopStory Antitrust

Back to Top

Antitrust Law Daily

Introducing Wolters Kluwer Antitrust Law Daily — a daily reporting service created by attorneys, for attorneys — providing same-day coverage of breaking news, court decisions, legislation, and regulatory activity.


A complete daily report of the news that affects your world

  • View full summaries of federal and state court decisions.
  • Access full text of legislative and regulatory developments.
  • Customize your daily email by topic and/or jurisdiction.
  • Search archives for stories of interest.

Not just news — the right news

  • Get expert analysis written by subject matter specialists—created by attorneys for attorneys.
  • Track law firms and organizations in the headlines with our new “Who’s in the News” feature.
  • Promote your firm with our new reprint policy.

24/7 access for a 24/7 world

  • Forward information with special copyright permissions, encouraging collaboration between counsel and colleagues.
  • Save time with mobile apps for your BlackBerry, iPhone, iPad, Android, or Kindle.
  • Access all links from any mobile device without being prompted for user name and password.