Man in violation of privacy law

Breaking news and expert analysis on legal and compliance issues

[Back To Home][Back To Archives]

From Antitrust Law Daily, February 7, 2014

Antitrust Division closes investigation into Samsung’s use of standards-essential patents

By Jody Coultas, J.D.

The Department of Justice Antitrust Division announced today that it has closed its investigation into Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd.’s use of its portfolio of standards-essential patents (SEPs) that it had committed to license to industry participants on fair, reasonable, and non-discriminatory (FRAND) terms to exclude certain Apple, Inc. iPhone and iPad products from the U.S. market.

Samsung allegedly attempted to use its SEPs to obtain exclusion orders from the U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC) relating to certain iPhone and iPad models. According to the Justice Department and the Patent and Trademark Office, a number of competitive issues arise when holders of SEPs seek to block their competitors from selling products that implement the SEPs.

The U.S. Trade Representative (USTR) reviewed the ITC exclusion order against Apple at Samsung’s request and overturned it, finding that it was not consistent with the public interest. Therefore, the Antitrust Division determined that no further action was required and closed its investigation. The Antitrust Division will continue to monitor further developments in this area.

“Throughout the investigation, the Antitrust Division has worked closely and consulted frequently with its colleagues at the European Commission,” according to the closing statement. “This cooperation underscores the agencies’ common concerns over the potential harm to competition that can result from the anticompetitive use of SEPs.”

Last fall, Samsung proposed a number of commitments in order to resolve European Commission concerns that Samsung violated EC competition rules by seeking injunctions against Apple on the basis of alleged infringements of its mobile phone SEPs. The EC invited comments on the commitments, under which Samsung proposed to refrain for five years from seeking such injunctions on the basis of its SEPs related to technologies implemented in smartphones and tablets against licensees that agree to a particular licensing framework. The framework consisted of (1) a negotiation period of up to 12 months and (2) if no agreement is reached during those 12 months, a third party determination of FRAN terms by either a court or an arbitrator, as agreed to by the parties.

Companies: Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd.

MainStory: TopStory Antitrust AntitrustDivisionNews

Antitrust Law Daily

Introducing Wolters Kluwer Antitrust Law Daily — a daily reporting service created by attorneys, for attorneys — providing same-day coverage of breaking news, court decisions, legislation, and regulatory activity.


A complete daily report of the news that affects your world

  • View full summaries of federal and state court decisions.
  • Access full text of legislative and regulatory developments.
  • Customize your daily email by topic and/or jurisdiction.
  • Search archives for stories of interest.

Not just news — the right news

  • Get expert analysis written by subject matter specialists—created by attorneys for attorneys.
  • Track law firms and organizations in the headlines with our new “Who’s in the News” feature.
  • Promote your firm with our new reprint policy.

24/7 access for a 24/7 world

  • Forward information with special copyright permissions, encouraging collaboration between counsel and colleagues.
  • Save time with mobile apps for your BlackBerry, iPhone, iPad, Android, or Kindle.
  • Access all links from any mobile device without being prompted for user name and password.